- Inconsistent Naming Conventions: Microsoft has used various names for Windows updates, such as Windows 10 Anniversary Update, Creators Update, Fall Creators Update, and then moving to names like Windows 11 22H2 and Windows 11 2023 Update. This inconsistency makes it difficult for users to understand and track updates.
- Comparison with Apple: Warren compares Microsoft’s approach to Apple’s, noting that Apple successfully uses point releases for iOS, iPadOS, and watchOS. He suggests that it’s easier to understand and troubleshoot issues on Apple devices due to their clearer versioning system.
- Complexity in Version Numbers: The article mentions that Windows’ version numbers, like 23H2, and the mix of KB numbers and OS build numbers on Microsoft’s update history page, are not user-friendly. These numbers are hard to comprehend for the average user.
- Microsoft’s History with Naming: The article also touches on Microsoft’s history of complicated naming conventions, not just with Windows but with other products like Windows Mobile and Windows Phone.
- Hope for Simplicity in Future: Warren expresses hope that with future versions of Windows, possibly Windows 12, Microsoft might adopt a clearer and simpler naming convention, possibly returning to point releases.
In summary, the article critiques Microsoft’s complex and inconsistent naming strategy for Windows updates, suggesting that a simpler, more user-friendly system would be beneficial.